comments

Vick can forget dog ownership

Reader Input
-A +A
It is truly confusing to me that there is even a discussion about whether or not Michael Vick should be allowed to own another dog. The Eagles’ coach may have thought giving Mr. Vick a second chance a good idea, but there should be no discussion on whether he is allowed to own another pet after the atrocities he committed before he was caught. Mr. Vick was personally responsible for the killing and suffering of dogs that would not, or could not, do as Michael Vick wished them to do. Some of the ways he destroyed his animals included shooting, hanging and drowning the animals that did not fight and the ones that did his bidding were killed in dogfights. Just one question — would we give a child molester or abuser another child? Holly Buckley, Dutch Flat