The media is claiming that the California Supreme Court upheld the right of the people of California to amend our constitution. This is "kinda true" but it is only the part of the story.

The whole story is that the California Supreme Court upheld THEIR right to redefine the constitution any time they want without any merit.

By asserting that the marriages that took place after Gavin Newsom illegally started marrying homosexuals against the law are now legal, and that their decision against the people of California to allow those marriages will be upheld, they established two fundamental paths for forward development of this case.

1) The California Supreme Court decided that homosexuals were "born that way" despite a lack of evidence to that effect, and thus homosexuals have civil rights based strictly on their sexual preference.

2) The people of California may have usurped their power, but there is always the US Supreme Court which can come to their rescue and tell the voters of California to pound sand.

This is not over. Before its done, our Supreme Court will demonstrate "empathy" for the homosexuals who, without any evidence to demonstrate such, "were born that way" and will deem that ALL STATES MUST provide for marriage between homosexuals.

Like Roe V. Wade where abortion was a state decision and the supreme court, without any evidence to demonstrate such, decided that life does not begin until birth and therefore deemed that ALL STATES MUST provide for legal abortion.

You saw it here first. Its not a victory, it is a step on the ladder of "empathetic" judges who decide what they want.