|
Possible
layoffs loom over city
Employees say they weren’t consulted
State budget cuts and a grim economic climate have forced the City of Auburn to consider laying off seven employees. Layoffs affecting the city Airport Manager Jerry Martin, Senior Accounting Technician Elisabeth Davis, the city’s lead custodian, custodian, senior building inspector, office assistant and facilities maintenance worker are being proposed and, if approved by the City Council, could take effect March 28. City Council members also voted 3-0 Monday night to make public a two-year retirement service credit, which is just part of an overall severance package city officials are preparing that should be ready by the end of the month, said City Manager Bob Richardson said. Councilmembers Bob Snyder and Bridget Powers were absent. Eight employees are currently eligible to participate in the incentive program, which city officials said would cost the city about $276,000 up front, but could ultimately save the city roughly $640,000 a year if all eligible employees participated. Richardson said before the meeting Monday, that the consideration of layoffs came as a result of several economic factors. “The first thing is a structural financial issue that the city has struggled with for a couple of decades,†Richardson said. “This was an issue we knew was coming and prepared for, however, at the same time, we are feeling the effects of an economic downturn and the state is shifting its budget problems to the cities, which required the need to take action.†Richardson said city officials have been bolstering reserves for years and cutting back on expenditures in anticipation of the city’s structural financial problem. “If there wasn’t the issue of the state and overall economy, the city would have been prepared to handle our structural problem much more effectively,†Richardson said. Martin told the council during Monday’s meeting that he has been given a termination date. “I’d like to confirm publicly what I was told privately,†Martin said. “I was informed by the City Manager that my position had been eliminated. I was not consulted — I was given a termination date and told when my last day of work would be.†Davis said she has been working for the city for more than 15 years and was planning to retire in a few years, but is now in a difficult position. “I don’t really have a choice,†she said. “A two-year retirement incentive would be nice, but I am going to lose two years of health insurance and two years of wages. I am a little puzzled for having worked here as long as I have. We were basically given our walking papers and told to go away.†City officials are still assessing the financial impacts the state’s budget will have on Auburn’s economy. “It appears to be getting worse with time,†Richardson said. “We are preparing a reorganization plan for the council and prioritizing service levels to be provided and basing them off of a three-year financial plan.†Richardson said there will have to be some service cuts, but that he and city staffers are focusing on prioritizing the services in order to maintain them at high levels. All three councilmembers present issued their sympathy to those who may be affected by the layoffs “There are certain times on the council where we have to make heart-wrenching decisions,†said Mayor Keith Nesbitt. “This is one of those times. This affects people. On paper, we are eliminating positions, but in reality we are dealing with people. I apologize that we are in this position, but we are and we were elected to make these difficult decisions.†The council is expected to vote on the plan, which includes the layoffs, at its March 24 meeting. In other business Monday night, the council voted 3-0 to deny an appeal of a recent City Planning Commission’s decision to approve a 15-foot rear yard setback variance for a 1,680 square foot addition to a residence on Floradale Lane in Auburn. A 25-foot setback is usually required in single-family residential zones, but according to city staff reports, a building permit for the property was issued in error. The appellant, neighboring resident Tammy Forrest, requested three conditions of approval to which the applicant, Jeffrey Hayes, said he could not comply with. While she was present at the meeting, Forrest did not comment to the council on the appeal. The council also voted unanimously to adopt an annual General Plan implementation work plan and housing element progress report for 2007 and directed staff to submit the plans to the state office of Planning and Development and the state department of Housing and Community Development. The Journal’s Jenna Nielsen can be reached at jennan@goldcountrymedia.com or comment on this story at auburnjournal.com.
|
Change Location:
|
Attending the meeting last night I found it quite amusing that the council was whining over the financial crunch and how they would have to lay off people, but earlier in the evening they decided to spend 20 million dollars on planting flowers and beautifying the sidewalks. When they were challenged as to where the money for that project would come from they refused to answer. If the city is in such a dire predicament for money, perhaps the city council should eliminate the flower project and then also take a pay cut. Actually any city council that is so incompetent as to approve a 20 million dollar flower project when the city is in such a financial down turn should not only have their salary cut but should really be fired. But then again if they weren't so incompetent they would have real jobs instead of working for the government.
This is a long response due to the Auburn City Counsel having their heads up their A$$.
First though I has was to suggest to FIRE or RECALL/IMPEACH all the city council members that voted on this absurd proposal.
If I understand the posted figures correctly there are 7 people employed by the city of Auburn that will have their job positions terminated this month to save the city of Auburn some money. Directly cut and pasted quote from the Auburn Journal article, today "Eight employees are currently eligible to participate in the incentive program, which city officials said would cost the city about $276,000 up front, but could ultimately save the city roughly $640,000 a year if all eligible employees participated."
First off, $640,000 divided by 7 people gives me about $91,428 that each proposed terminated employee was getting paid on an average. That is way too much money in my opinion for any of those job positions. According to the previous post by "corvetterich "who attended the council meeting last night, another quote, "earlier in the evening they decided to spend $20,000,000 (twenty million dollars) to beautify the sidewalks by planting flowers."
#1 question, why do they need so many flowers to be planted, what will twenty million dollars worth of flowers do to improve the city of Auburn, and where would they be planted, in front of council members houses??
#2 question, is a relative of a city council member getting the contract to supply the flowers???
Leaning towards the Auburn Airport Manager job position being eliminated now,,,
Jerry Martin has been doing a good on site job of managing the Auburn Airport, who would be taking over that responsibility,?,?,? Some sort of thrown together Airport board comprised of every day people with no management skills??? God forbid it would be this city council that does not have a clue as to what is going on out there, or know how to manage an airport.
Reiterate again, get rid of the existing City Council.... They have not a clue what they are doing. or the impact they will be causing to the city of Auburn. They should all be replaced/fired. They refused to answer questions last night to justify spending $20,000,000 for flowers , I would have their positions terminated if they refused to answer to public inquiries about their spending plans as they did at the meeting last night.
Last item, Previously when there was not an Airport Manager to over see operations and distribution of funding,,, it was said the the city of Auburn illegally took the revenues generated by the Auburn Airport, and supplemented by the Federal government, and "appropriated" , "took" the money provided by the Federal Government to use in the General Fund for the City of Auburn,, not cool and illegal to do that. The revenue generated and provided to/by the Airport is not to be sidetracked off to provide funding to the City of Auburn, especially for planting flowers!!! That is Federal money to be spent on improving the Auburn Airport, all that money should stay at the Airport. period... A Carbon Copy, CC, of this post will be emailed to the FAA and all appropriate Federal Government agencies to apprise them of the attempt to syphon Federal Funding by the Auburn City Council. If I were to have it my way I would have all the Auburn City Council members fired/replaced..